Macro Photography

[Judy N]

I have been researching a Macro lens for my Canon EOS digital 50D and was wondering if any one has an opinion on what they like or don't like about macro lenses. I haven't really decided on any yet. Just in the early stages of finding one. Thanks.

 

[ejones]

I like my 100mm macro lens. While it's not L glass it's got great quality. I did consider the 50mm before buying it but decided I'd like to have the focal semi-telephoto length as well.

 

[Tony S]

I also have the 100 2.8 macro, great piece of glass. There are alot of times though where the longer macro would be nice so as not to scare off little critters and such.

 

[Leia]

I like this CANON LENS (& camera) REVIEW site. With details, comparisons and samples.

Here is the lens I use for my macros - it is the 60mm F/2.8 USM. Not L Quality, but for the price I am really happy with it

 

[Brianjbean]

I use a Takumar 50mm F4 1:1 macro lens with my Canon 5d mkii and get amazing results. It's a 50 year old lens and strictly manual, but the images have amazing color saturation and sharpness and the thing is dirt cheap compared to the Canon macro lenses. I paid $6 for mine at a thrift store plus another $20 for an adapter, but the going rate on ebay is around $75. It's just a lot of fun to use. But I have used both the Canon 60mm F2.8 and the 100mm macro and they are both good lenses though. I'm not gonna lie.

 

[JaniceL]

This is handheld with the canon 100mm 2.8

as were these

 

[Scottpix]

I have the Canon 100mm macro and 180mm macro. I've used the 50mm macro.

The 50mm is too short for a lot of macro use. To get close enough to the subject, the lens actually ends up shading the subject. If you are trying to shoot bugs, that is close enough to scare them off.

The 100mm is probably the most popular. It is a reasonably priced lens, and is more practical than the 50mm for most uses. It is relatively lightweight. It isn't an "L" lens, but it is a prime, and a good one. Lots of people also use this as a portrait lens. At this focal length, it has lots of uses besides macro.

I love my 180mm macro. It is a fantastic lens. Super sharp. Gives more working distance than the others. When I shoot real macro, this is what I use 90% of the time. That being said, I really don't use it all that often. Except for dedicated macro work, it spends most of its time sitting on a shelf collecting dust. It is a pretty expensive lens for limited use. It is also longer and heavier than the other lenses. It comes with a tripod collar. It is too long to use with on-camera flash. You need a ring flash or some off camera flash if you need extra light.

So if you are serious about macro, and you have money to spare, you can't go wrong with the 180mm macro. Fantastic lens. But most people settle for the 100mm, which is a very nice lens for a LOT less money.

 

[Judy N]

Thanks

Thanks for the input. It looks like I will be getting the 100mm.

 

[BrianH]

I use my Tamron 80-300 zoom. the macro range is 150-300 its can be tough because you are too far away............100mm sounds good too me!

 

[Tony S]

On Craigslist in Puyallup right now....



http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/pho/1763635652.html

 

[Railgeek]

If you don't have one grand lying around, and are wanting a 180mm macro, try the Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX DG macro lens. You can pick one up off of Amazon for about 600 bucks. I've got one now, and love it- all the way up to 1:1, and it can substitute as a really sharp telephoto.

http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-180mm-Macro-Canon-Cameras/dp/B0009JKGXS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1275104342&sr=8-2