You wanna do WHAT!?! Are you kidding me?
Full Story Here:
http://www.waterfallsnorthwest.com/nws/blog_article.php?blID=68
Not familiar with Sunset Falls? That's not surprising, since it's not easily accesible. In fact, getting the "classic" photo usually means going down a private road. (Sign? What sign? I didn't see any sign...)
However, if you're a railfan, you will most likely recognized the location. Here's an image by forum member Steve Carter:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=294630
This location was used for a well know railroad publicity shot, and is popular with railroad photographers.
The proposed project would house a 19-foot diameter tunnel to flume the river to the powerhouse. This would certainly allow for a minimum flow to be sent over the falls, but the kicker is that the project's capacity would be approximately 2500 cubic feet per second - which is greater than the mean annual flow for the river at this point. This means that while Canyon and Sunset Falls would still flow during the winter months, they may be entirely dry during the summer under this proposal.
Full Story Here:
http://www.waterfallsnorthwest.com/nws/blog_article.php?blID=68
Not familiar with Sunset Falls? That's not surprising, since it's not easily accesible. In fact, getting the "classic" photo usually means going down a private road. (Sign? What sign? I didn't see any sign...)
However, if you're a railfan, you will most likely recognized the location. Here's an image by forum member Steve Carter:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=294630
This location was used for a well know railroad publicity shot, and is popular with railroad photographers.